Thursday, January 25, 2007, 10:21:27 PM, George wrote:
Hoping that your mind won't blow, here's a very well-sourced example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_general_election%2C_1946
That's a terrible article. It's not an encyclopedia article, it's a scholarly paper on the topic.
It's not a bad scholarly paper, on first look, but it's not a good encyclopedia article.
Do you have any reasons you think so? I don't think there's any policy claiming that Wikipedia articles should be dumbed down. For that, there's simple English Wikipedia. :-)