-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 10/22/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/22/05, Anthony DiPierro wikispam@inbox.org wrote:
I think you're wrong about the intent of most contributors, though. And
if
keeping one article on an unremarkable band would set a precedent, and
bring
more articles on bands, I see that as a good precedent, not a bad one.
One wouldn't be a problem, and neither would ten thousand. We've got thousands of articles on unremarkable cities, and I don't see a problem
with
that either. Anthony
Even crap need mentaining we just don't have the rescources to mentian a million articles millionth rate bands.
-- geni
Who's going to create these million articles on garage bands? With 100,000 new garage band fans creating them we'll have no problem maintaining a million articles on garage bands. I think realistically it'll be at least a couple orders of magnitude smaller in both figures, but as long as we don't allow automated creation of these articles the resources to maintain the articles will scale right along with the creation of them.
We will have eternal POV, verifiablity and credibility problems.
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \