A editor recently accused others and their source, Prof. Harvey Klehr, of being part of a lynching. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&a... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&diff=34950836&oldid=34254772
He has repeated these libels here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Americans_in_the_Veno... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_papers&diff=35566271&oldid=35564984%C2%A0
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&a...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_pa... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_papers&diff=34527735&oldid=34519165
alleging this 'Posse' Comitatus is part of a conspiracy to justify civil rights violations.
Now the editor has filed an RfM to force insertion of defamatory criticism like this of Prof. Harvey Klehr in several articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation#Significance_o...
What the editor neglects to state in his RfM is his own conflict of interest, cited here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_...
and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chip_Berlet#Human_Rights_Activist
How long will this abuse of legitimate Wikipedia dispute resolution processes be tolerated?
Nobs01