On 21/12/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/12/2007, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. What we didn't have in those days though, was transclusion. An interesting idea would perhaps be to transclude smaller grain portions of an agglomerated article into it. Not sure if that is a wise idea or not.
I believe this [is/has been] done with some of the cricket articles. Don't know how that experiment worked out... anyone familiar with it?
Yeah, their templates got zapped. Templates that pretend to be body text are rather susceptible to abuse and off-watchlist article changing, and have been used that way in the past. There's as yet no way to say "this template can only go in these articles."
- d.