OQ> I think I remember participating in a discussion about one such OQ> article. Those who were for the existence of the article made the OQ> point that "criticism" doesn't necessarily imply that the commentary OQ> is negative (although it is often used in this way). Therefore a OQ> "Criticism of..." article should cover views both pro- and contra-.
Well... the main article should cover both views. Currently, all of those 50 articles listed at [[Wikipedia:List of POV forks]] include negative facts and/or opinions (a few do have rebuttals).
The idea behind this is to take all the negative facts and opinions and put them outside of the main page, so people won't see them.