Even with a broad consensus that this was a terrorist attack that is a word which nevertheless expresses a POV. It is not really necessary to the title. After all, what other September 11 attack could one possibly be talking about? The title can be understood without even putting the year of the attack. The word "terrorist" remains a characterization even when its application is obvious.
I guess that Lance was just following the rule to be bold in one's edits. Ec
Pedro Fortuny wrote:
- Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net [2004-01-14]:
Actually not bad. In their eyes they are just defending themselves.
Fred
Yes, but their eyes are not the only ones (and the move, which is quite bold, was done without asking/discussing).
Pedro.
From: Pedro Fortuny pfortuny@sdf-eu.org
For the record: Lancemurdoch has renamed
"September 11 terrorist attack"
to
"September 11 attck"
I guess this is not very very very very good withoug asking beforehand.