There isn't much to discuss here. Articles should cite verifiable POV's in a neutral manner. Ergo we cite scientific journal X, and religious periodical Y. Everybody reads and makes up their own minds.
Only the most irredeemable fanatic feels that science possesses a monopoly on the truth, or that all things labeled as "pseudoscience" by random eggheads (or worse yet POV pushing wikipedia editors) are in fact unscientific or lacking in merit.
In short, cite sources in a neutral manner. Do NOT attempt to make the wikipedia a primary source, or bully pulpit from which to spout materialist pseudoscience.
Sam Spade