geni wrote:
On 12/14/05, Kelly Martin kelly.lynn.martin@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/05, Kelly Martin kelly.lynn.martin@gmail.com wrote:
There are way too many admins who shouldn't be, then.
It isn't as if we have the luxery to say that.
Just what do you mean by that? There's no reason why we need to continue to grant admin privileges to people who abuse them.
Kelly
We don't have enough active admins. Roveing the ones we do have on any reasonable scale is not an option.
You make it sound as though a perceived shortage of admins is reason enought to keep the rogues. Those rogues can drain as much time from the good admins as any group of common vandals.
Ec