I suggested somewhere along in here that this seems a reasonable approach, as long as the main article says the truth about such depictions in summary, and that it gives a reasonable enough hint/statement that the images are in the other article.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/02/2008, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't we just put all the illustrations into the "depictions" article, say that they're there in the other article, and get on with the rest of our lives secure in the knowledge that yet another Alexandrian immolation has been averted by the use of commonsense.
I have absolutely no idea. It's been suggested in the past and doesn't seem to have got anywhere...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l