On 6/7/07, John Lee johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
Huh? Then why do we have IAR in the first place? Citing it is terribly useful when confronted with people who follow policies to the letter without using their good judgment.
Johnleemk
Ok you are trying to defend something that appears to violate policy. There are three options: 1)You are a competent rule lawyer and decide to use this fact.- You show how what you've done doesn't technically break policy (even if you had to take the Square root of a negative number to do it) 2) You are an incompetent rule lawyer.- You cite IAR 3)You are not a rule lawyer or decide you don't want to rule lawyer.- You make a solid logical evidence based case as to why in this case going against policy is the correct thing to do. You may wish to bring more people into the debate.