On 21/10/2007, fredbaud@waterwiki.info fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
And the obvious answer is of course not. Any policy must respect natural limits (not "go to zero") and imperfect results are to be expected. However, user who are being harassed should see efforts to reduce its frequency and impact, however ineffective in absolute terms such efforts are.
That's a sweet thought, but the problem (and the debate, and the arbcom case) is about when it becomes counterproductive and actively damaging to the actual project.
- d.