On 6/10/07, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/10/07, David Mestel david.mestel@gmail.com wrote:
Except that since there seem to be more articles requiring improvement
than
there are people willing or able to devote time to improving them, the question is not "would we want the article if it were improved?", but
"do we
think that the article in its current state is beneficial to the quality
of
the encyclopedia?".
Except in the most extreme cases, deletion should be considered only after other measures have failed.
—C.W.
That's the key, you can't asssume no one will fix it without trying.