On 8/25/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Michael Turley michael.turley@gmail.com On 8/25/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
It was not I who made it a point to mention the history of the users' name as if that added to the legitimacy of blocking the user.
Your inference was not implied by my statement, which was merely explaining why the user chose the name, for those who were not familiar with it.
Yeah, sure, that's why you said "indicative of his mindset".
You wrote: "the editor identifies with the Amalekites, either in identifying with those who attempted to commit genocide against Israelites, or in feeling he is targeted for genocide by them. In either case, it is indicative of his mindset."
Now you say "indicative of his mindset" has nothing to do with the topic at hand? Then why did you mention it?
Now that your point has struck your own buttocks,
A point I never made cannot strike my own buttocks.
Not if you deny it ever happened, it cannot.
It is not a bannable offense to choose an exterminated nation as a user name. That's all I was explaining.
Read [[Straw man]] again. And I'm done feeding you for today as well.
Jay.
If you re-read everything I've written on this subject carefully, I think you'll find that addressing me as if I were a troll is a very hostile and unfair thing to do.
I've taken this subject seriously the entire time, and every single comment has been with the intent of improving Wikipedia.
If you consider that trolling, then I think your judgement is poorer than the average editor.