On 1/19/06, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Not exactly, but by those who would want standards to do least harm, or who would like peace in the community. If you want to take that personally that's your problem.
Strangly I would argue my standards would cause the least harm and I certianly want peace in the community.
That statement seems on a par with those people who say that they have a best friend that's black.
I fail to see the logic. The above also appears to be an appeal to emotion
Who would be so fucking foolish as to twist praise for civil disobedience into an accusation of disruption.
Civil disobedience also causes dissruption. That is the whole point.
It doesn't take much rethinking to reaffirm what I said. There are whole countries where any suggestion that it can promulgate unjust laws would result in severe consequences. Was it my error to believe that Wikipedia was not one of those countries?
Wikipedia is not a country.
That kind of rule parrotting suggests that you don't spend a hell of a lot of time looking at the financial pages of newspapers.
Ec
What is your chain of logic here?
-- geni