Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Rich Holton wrote:
<snip> > You do realize that for much of Wikipedia's history, the route to being > an admin was much less strict than we have now. Despite this, and > despite the fact that there are relatively very few cases of people > being "de-adminned", cases of rogue admins doing huge damage are either > non-existent or very rare, depending on what you consider "huge damage". >
So, you know the history of Oversight then?
Geni,
If you have examples that demonstrate me wrong, please do bring them forward.
-Rich