On 13/09/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 9/12/06, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
The underlying issue is that the FA process is wearing two different hats. It's based on criteria that people want to use as a checklist for *all* articles -- hence the idea of having 100,000 FAs -- but at the same time fills the role of selecting our "very best work" (with all the prestige implicit is that) and serving as pretty much the only formal recognition for articles available in Wikipedia.
That's an excellent point, and maybe the time has come to admit that the FA process *doesn't* apply to every article. Taking the FA process out of the whole grading scheme might just get more people to work on an actual checklist.
Yep. That's why I posted that list here.
Of course this brings up the question of whether or not a checklist is what we want?
Saves arguing, I suppose, as compared to more subjective criteria.
Also: it's not a disaster if an article somehow ticks all the boxes but isn't actually all that great.
(I still like my article rating idea, though I have NO IDEA what would possibly satisfy Brion enough to put it in.)
- d.