James Farrar schrieb:
On 21/02/2008, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Thomas Dalton schrieb:
Don't even think about adding such a show/hide feature to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
I got a Level 3 Vandalism warning template on my talk page for doing so. WP:AGF seems to be another policy admins don't have to follow.
You did something there is quite clearly not a consensus for - that's either bad faith, or very bad judgement, your choice.
Did you ever bother to look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad/images
There are 8 pages full of complaints about the Muhammad images.
I'd conclude, that there is indeed a strong disagreement to that alleged "consensus".
"No consensus for action" != "consensus for no action".
I agree.
WP:CON doesn't say anything about a "consensus for no action", indeed it says that no group should "block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision".