On Nov 29, 2007 12:19 PM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:37 AM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:14 AM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
While some may still think there is value in insisting that witnesses should be subpoenaed here to name names, I think it's time to call this House Committee on Un-Wikipedian Activities to a close.
I find it humorous how much hypocrisy there is in this whole incident. Telling people to assume good faith in response to an enormous assumption of bad faith; comparing the demand for answers about a group of investigators trying to uncover anyone who is now or ever has associated themselves with Wikipedia Review to McCarthyism...
You see, this is why I rarely respond to your e-mails, Anthony.
It'd probably make more sense to respond to one of my e-mails which is not an example of why you rarely respond to my emails.
The cyberstalking list was set up for Wikipedians who have been cyberstalked as a result of their Wikipedia activities.
Clearly it was set up for Wikipedians who claim to have been cyberstalked. What's unclear is what those people talk about on the list, at least, other than the one email which did come to light and was not at all positive.
I'm not aware of any "group of investigators trying to uncover anyone who is now or ever has associated themselves with Wikipedia Review"; that's more hysteria.
Just because you're unaware of something doesn't make it untrue.