On 2/20/07, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/02/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
I'm with Oskar. If they call various administrators abusive they should be able to back that up.
Ah, but the emails in question contained diffs which they claimed shewed that the administrators in question were "abusive". Should those have been let through?
Calling someone "abusive" is still an ad hominem statement. Rather than saying "Admin X is abusive!1!" the person should say "Admin X engaged in behaviour on Y page that seemed abusive to me, here's some diffs..."