Carcharoth wrote:
I recently came across this page, on another wiki, where they compare themselves to Wikipedia.
Interesting or not? What good points do they make?
http://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Groupprops:Groupprops_versus_Wikipedia
You realise that User:Vipul has contributed similarly to enWP? This person seems to be essentially the only contributor there. Such a wiki can serve a useful and more traditional purpose: documenting what a small group of specialists know about a well-defined area. I would take the claim to have a distinctive content policy with a pinch of salt, because it looks mainly like an old-style wiki and not a WP-style set-up with people arguing from general principles. In other words "WP is not typical", which is an old chestnut.
Charles