Vicki Rosenzweig wrote:
I don't think it's unreasonable for people to point out cases (e.g. VeraCruz) in which a banned user comes back in disguise and repeats the behavior that caused banning.
I think that's right, and I encourage people to just write to me privately in cases like this so I can investigate and we don't have to talk about it endlessly on the mailing list. There should never be any "secret bans" or "quiet bans", but at the same time, if we're just engaged in some kind of ongoing battle with someone, we don't always need to discuss every aspect of it.
--Jimbo