On 24/11/2007, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
JzG wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:42:22 -0500, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
There's lots of things we could do!
The problem with that is that if we've identified a neutrality issue we really ought to let people know.
Trivia is not a neutrality issue. Not-long-enough introductions are not a neutrality issue.
It is frequently a NPOV issue though, if it isn't notable. And if it is to be notable, then it must be verifiably notable, so there's a verifiability issue *also* in many cases.
Where trivia meets the NPOV and verifiability and reliable source requirements, then it *should* stay.
Right?
Right.