Delirium wrote:
The problem with this approach is that while Wiki is Not Paper, readers' attention spans are limited. If I want to read an overview of Mother Theresa's life, I most certainly do not want it to be 20 pages long. I'd much prefer a more summarized (dare I say, "encyclopedia-style") biography.
Well, if the page gets too long, we can break it down conceptually somehow. This is what we do all the time, right?
articles (maybe "Criticism of Mother Theresa" and "Reasons for Mother Theresa's Beatification" or something similar).
Yes. In some cases that's the right thing to do. In other cases, it would make more sense to break it down chronologically or by some other conceptual schema, right? There are some downsides to putting "pro" and "con" in different articles. (And upsides, too, esp. if it keeps the peace around here!)
As it stands, I think that the article needs a major rewrite, and that it is, in fact, unbalanced in its current form.
Notice that we have a section (3) "Campaign on abortion and contraceptives" and a subsection (5.7) containing on criticisms of what is presented in (3). That strikes me as stylistically poor, and I think this also lends to the unbalanced 'feel' of the article.
(1) is Life and Work, which is symmetrical with (4) about her death.
I can envision that a future revision of the article might combine (1) (2) and (4) into a general biographical section, and then there could be links to more detailed articles on her specific work -- and these articles would of course be written in such a way that both a supporter of Mother Theresa and a detractor would consider to be fair.
I can only assume that somewhere easily accessible, when we get around to it, there are the facts we'd expect to find, like "Mother Theresa provided care for 100,000 poor, and got a law passed to prevent thus-and-so, and found 347 clinics in villages that had never had anything of the sort, and blah blah blah."
Presumably, those facts are needed to give a well-rounded picture here.
--Jimbo