Jack is his own worst enemy, but in my opinion he had a just complaint against Wikipedia because of several inaccuracies in the article, and a rather gross libel based on a misreading of a Usenet discussion. I don't know what became of that case--last I heard, Ed Poor was trying to fix it and facing stiff opposition. As with the Wollmann case, we have to keep nonsense from the less salubrious parts of Usenet from bubbling over into Wikipedia and landing us with a legacy of ill will.