On 4/20/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I should be clearer; I'm not trying to talk about the not-very-good article currently there, but rather the philosophical issue of having the article at all, which seems to be the issue here. Anyone wanting to tear down a shitty article has my blessing, but we should be wary of declaring a subject bad simply because an attempt to cover it was bad.
Fair enough. I don't disagree with you that something useful could be put where the current article sits.
Anthony