2009/2/2 Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, that's definitely the most important statistic. A more useful statistic would be the age of the oldest unreviewed revision.
17.8 days http://toolserver.org/~aka/cgi-bin/reviewcnt.cgi?lang=english&action=out...
Ask, and you shall receive! Thank you!
So that's 10570 articles that have been waiting over a day (out of 12667 articles with out of date reviews). That's pretty bad... I would have expected a long tail type distribution. Any ideas why there are so many very out-of-date article compared to slightly out-of-date ones?