I'm seriously concerned about a recent arbcom enforcement. A ban was ordered against [[User:C Colden]] as per the ruling in the case of Lyndon LaRouche.
C Colden was not a Wikipedia user when the LaRouche ruling was made. He was not a party to that case. However, the ruling of the case, apparently, was a ruling against the insertion of "original research originating with the LaRouche movement" (Which seems to be an interchangable phrase with "the LaRouche point of view") into any article by any user.
This seems to me to reflect a hard arbcom ruling that the LaRouche POV is not something that need be included under the Wikipedia NPOV policy. As loathesome as I find the LaRouche movement to be, I am seriously troubled by the notion that the arbcom can and will make blanket rulings that certain perspectives are not part of NPOV.
-Snowspinner