Even in the same general subject area:
A/ Notability is a property of the topic B/ The judgement about notability depends on the availability of suitable sources C/ The presence of adequate sources about a particular individual subject depends to a considerable extent on how carefully the article is researched and written. D/ How carefully the article is done depends upon the skills and degree of involvement of the particular editors who are interested
E/ Notability has to be proven at AfD with a presumption against it. F/ How well the notability can be defended depends not only upon the underlying evidence, but upon the relative number and quality of the arguments between the defenders and the attackers G/ The judgment depends upon the numbers, skills, and degree of concern of the editors, both positive and negative, for the individual particular subject.
The inevitable result of this is that the presence of articles on people or places of essentially equal importance will not be consistent.
For example, the available sources for the ski resort being discussed are apparently more than is presently within the article (based on the above postings), but the article was not written to incorporate them.(& has not even incorporated them under the threat of AfD.) At the same time, several ski resorts near Washington DC have also been challenged, and the articles will almost certainly stay, due in large part to the presence at AfD of people who are familiar with the resorts.
DGG David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.