On 20/06/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:26:05 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
The other change I'd really like to see to the AfD process is that, following a "Keep" result, there should be a presumption against deletion in further AfDs
There already is, in *all* AfDs, not just previously-kept.
Yes, but you cunningly snipped the part of the sentence that contained my actual point: "with the preferred remedy (if remedy proves necessary) being restoration to the version of the article that was [previously] Kept."