On 8/30/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Did what? You deny he's restricted editing in the past, or that he called it becoming more open?
Where did Jimbo "decide to restrict editing" and then "called it becoming more open".
I have no idea where he did it, but one instance would be when creation of new articles was restricted.
Technically, the word anonymous means without a name.
So a user who logs in as "88 dot 33 dot 23 dot 23" is anonymous?
No, they just have a stupid name.
I'm not suggesting that the use of the word anonymous is wise... It's not, especially when talking to outsiders. I'm just pointing out that it isn't incorrect, as you stated.
Unwise and confusing, or inaccurate, whatever. It should be phrased better.