sannse said:
Rick wrote:
Are we really supposed to believe that people who would object to the appearance of a photograph at [[Autofellatio]] won't also object to the text at [[Fuck]]?
RickK
Yes. I am personally in exactly that category.
I don't think that's a problem. Where it becomes a problem is that users are unwilling to learn how to operate their browsers so they want Wikipedia to provide links to *all* users instead of the inlines they expect. Illustrations aren't essential, of course. But they're very useful, adding immediacy and impact, color and life to the pages of an encyclopedia. It may be that some of the pictures aren't to everybody's taste (I cannot safely look at a picture of a caterpillar, for instance, without risking waking nightmares) but it surely doesn't merit making everybody's browsing experience more clunky, when a few clicks of the mouse is all that the reader (speaking from experience) needs to do.