Oskar Sigvardsson wrote:
On 2/22/07, David Gerard wrote:
As the mailing list for a wiki, readers have to have some of the tolerance to stupidity they need to have to work on the wiki itself. Just as working productively with *complete idiots* is pretty much mandatory on the wiki, putting up with this shit to some degree is hard to avoid here.
I guess you have some sort of point there, but you know what, I've had enough. I can't trust a single word he says and I can't be sure whether any of his policy suggestions are sincere or just ways to mess with us and waste our time. In my book, he has lost all credibility. I'm done reading his posts.
The kind of piling on that I've seen in this thread against Parker is an obscenity that makes his faults mild by comparison. His ways of expressing himself leave much to be desired, but the reaction of some admins, the accusations of lying, the ridicule, the belittling, the lynch-mob mentality go far beyond anything that he could single-handedly do are absolutely sickening.
Try looking at his suggestions on their own merit, without regard to who is making them. Maybe some people find that they hit too close to home.
Ec