"For example, if you consult the world's most useless online text, the captive Wikipedia, you'll see Fuller's entry is a plug for Eric "AI" Drexler."
From:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/14/buckminster_fuller_stamp/
Another weird thing about this is that there is no rational possibility of reading that entry as a "plug for Eric "AI" Drexler". Drexler is mentioned, in one sentence, but not favorably or unfavorably, just a simple fact.
Is the whole article just an inside joke or something? I'd hate to call the guy to discuss this only to find out I'm just lame for not getting the joke.
--Jimbo