You did not understand me. I do not suggest that every one takes the role of an arbitrator in turn. I suggest that the pool of arbitrator is larger, and that people in *that* pool take turns.
Similarly, I honestly believe that there would be some benefit if some sysops found themselves not sysops from time in time.
Fred Bauder a écrit:
This is not good because a great deal of experience is necessary to do arbitration well. We need to eventually get to the place where serious things are treated seriously and mere annoyances rather lightly. It takes quite a while to get to where the difference is observable.
Fred
From: Anthere anthere8@yahoo.com Reply-To: anthere8@yahoo.com, English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:17:39 +0100 To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Transition to WikiDemocracy
(4) Alternately, we could try to develop a system of "policy juries," through which everyone occasionally gets asked at random to participate in policy decisions. For a discussion of how policy juries work, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarchy
--Sheldon Rampton
Better. I also like the idea to do the same with arbitrators (like a jury)...and with sysops :-)