On 6/18/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/18/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/18/07, K P kpbotany@gmail.com wrote:
But you don't. You just bring it up when they apply for adminship. It seems that Charlotte did not read the Armedblowfish (redundancies abound) issue, as she seemed rather surprised that you brought it up.
The word you are looking for is not "suprised", but "defensive".
More like outraged. You were trusted with private information and you abused that trust.
Again, I didn't reveal any private information; in fact, I had no private information to reveal, so I couldn't have done so even if I had wanted to. I recommend reading Mackensen's "vote" on the CW RFAR; it's currently Oppose number 47, or here's a link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship...