In a message dated 9/17/2008 6:28:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, stephen.bain@gmail.com writes:
However the court did discuss what might have been necessary to constitute reproduction of a substantial part, and taking plotlines and so forth probably would have amounted to reproduction.>> ------------------- The way you've worded this, does not make it clear whether you are stating that: A) "The court discussed it... and in THEIR discussion mentioned 'taking plotlines'" or B) "The court discussed it.. and it's my opinion that 'taking plotlines'....
Can you clarify and if possible cite to the opinion discussion details
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)