On 6/17/07, ElinorD elinordf@gmail.com wrote:
Charlotte was Support Number 56 at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Armedblowfish,
a page which at the time of her vote was devoted to discussion of the whole issue of policy and open proxies. This was at 02:28 on 5 June 2007. She accepted her own admin nomination at 18:52 on 14 June 2007. Is it likely that she supported Armedblowfish without even looking at the previous comments?
I took a quick look at the RfA and I didn't see anything about the policy beyond the fact that TOR IP addresses are routinely blocked. In fact, considering that the first 55 votes are all support votes it seems to me that anyone reading that page would assume that there is a clear consensus that there is *not* a policy banning people from editing using TOR. Armedblowfish came right out and said that ey intended to do it, and 55 people unanimously agreed that it was an acceptable thing to do. Seems to me like a clear consensus that it's perfectly OK to edit Wikipedia using TOR.