On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:03:52 -0400, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
All the indications are that this was a technical offence. It has been suggested that he touched his nurse inappropriately while trying to gain her attention. We don't know, because there is virtually no source material to work on, and that is why we should not have an article.
What indication is there, other than your unsourced "suggestion" which contradicts all the other evidence, that this was a technical offence? If Peppers accidently "touched his nurse inappropriately while trying to gain her attention", then he is not guilty of the offense, and this story is even more important.
Original research. we don't know (either way) because there are no reliable sources.
Yes, right now we can't find any source material to definitively determine exactly what happened. The same could be said of a large number of articles. But unlike your suggestion, there is plenty of source material to create a short article on what we *do* know.
The point is, this has so little neutral coverage that we almost certainly won't know. If we ever get a contemporaneous news report which details what happened and to whom then we might arguably have enough to go on, but honestly there is nothing here on which to base a biography.
Guy (JzG)