-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Not if we wrote it properly. The only way a policy can be 'gamed' if it is written ambiguously or in a way that is down to interpretation (e.g. CSD T1 - what exactly 'divisive' means is down to the individual, and two people acting in good faith can interpret it in completely different ways). If, for example, we simply wrote it as:
Any image depicting children engaged in sexual intercourse or posing with sex toys
There is nothing in that (that I can see) which could possibly be 'gamed' or misinterpreted.
Cynical
Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell webmaster@davidarussell.co.uk wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes deletable child porn on Wikipedia.
No. That would give the campaigners and trolls a target to try to game. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l