David Gerard wrote:
Or perhaps he didn't do anything wrong, and that because you don't like it just isn't sufficient.
I really don't think that's the case, I'm not exactly picking a borderline individual. 3 RfCs and 2 ArbCom cases...
I think what it shows is that your assumption that where there's smoke there MUST be fire is *not* correct, and that there is in fact good reason to be profoundly sceptical of your proposals for setting up new lynch mob mechanisms because you can't sufficiently punish these offenders you refuse to name using the existing ones.
This has nothing to do with smoke and fire, though. It's rather discouraging to have calls for accountability be dismissed as lynch mob tactics, though. Quite counterproductive.
-Jeff