There is an 'artistic' tag - so the Michelangelo's David image would be tagged as 'images of naked buttocks' and 'this material appears in an artistic context'
Cynical
Mark Wagner wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo%27s_David
Does this one contain naked buttocks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Donatello_david_plaster_replica_right_100...
What would most internet filtering software packages say?
No idea. Who cares? If we want to do this we would want to do a reasonable job.
Well, if the idea of tagging is to work with internet filtering packages, as I presume it is, finding out what works best with them would not be a bad idea in the slightest.
The last time I looked into this, what works best with internet filtering packages is broad-brush yes-or-no labeling designed to keep kids away from pornography and other subjects that could lead to awkward questions. In short, we could reasonably use it to keep kids away from Wikipedia entirely, or for the better software, [[List of sex positions]], but it can't provide the fine control to selectively block one or the other of (note: neither image particularly work-safe) [[Image:Human-woman.png]] and [[Image:Mass Grave Bergen Belsen May 1945.jpg]].
-- Mark [[User:Carnildo]] _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l