Bryan Derksen wrote:
At 05:26 PM 2/13/2005 -0800, Nicholas Knight wrote:
I see nothing wrong with an encyclopedia having a blanket policy that sexually explicit photographs not be displayed in articles. You can argue relativism, subjectiveness, and "censorship" all you want, we both know it's crap.
You _think_ it's crap. Others obviously think otherwise, or there'd be no ongoing debate.
Guess what? They're wrong. I'm right.
There, I said it.
It's CRAP. Everyone here KNOWS it. Stop pretending this is a grey area, it's not.