On 6/17/07, NSLE (Wikipedia) nsle.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure where you're going with this. This is the third time (at least) I've seen you ask this. I've seen no evidence that either of them are using or have used proxies. There is no reason for you to be targetting them specifically, unless you know something all of us else don't.
I am not targetting them simply as they are the ones--Slim and Jay--that are keen to roil RFA to make it much harder for "new" admins to come in, yet there is no talk of ensuring/enforcing such things to all admins--new and old. I know nothing of secret information here, on this case, yet, that others do not. I am not going to ask again for the questions, but the general evasiveness and deflection of answers has been problematic here. However, there is NO reason what's good for the RFA goose isn't good for the established gander.
They feel that "new" admins shouldn't get the bit if they use/have used TOR or open proxies in the past. I can agree with this. The question is, will they assert to stand by those convictions and have themselves be tested. They need not reply to *this* email, as it is preferred they give answers to the three simple questions.
Short: all we hear is ensuring new admins this, and that. No where do we see talk of pursuing/checking old admins for such things. Why is that? I wish to AGF, but it seems quite plainly like a further attempt to ensure that established "core community" are more special than everyone else.
Regards, Joe http://www.joeszilagyi.com