Geoff Burling wrote:
Jimbo has done something that I believe we can all work with: he explained *why* this person is non-notable in suitable detail that not only can another person debate the reasoning, but if the nomination carries this case could be used as a precedent & perhaps become a new guideline. (His argument is quite similar to what SlimVirgin had written about using Usenet as a source a few months back.)
And additionally, I should note, my presumption of non-notability could be easily defeated by pointing to an article or two in legitimate mainstream martial arts magazines. Or, as in the case of Sollog, a newspaper article or two about him being eccentric would suffice.
Maybe the solution for nominations that consist of "non-notable; Delete" is to respond "Keep; Why?"
*nod*
"Non-notable; delete" is a pretty lame vote. :-) But so is "notable; keep".
--Jimbo