Sam Korn wrote:
Merge and delete is not a possible vote. People should not have to
vote in such a specific way to prevent vote-hijacking.
Sure it is.
*'''Merge''' [[Poisonous influences of fruit]] into [[Kumquat]] and delete. Good content, but it doesn't stand alone well and it's at a misleading title.
I just made that up but I can easily imagine a case where something like this would be worth doing. As for whether it's "hijacking" a vote, I'm not sure what you mean. If an article got one third "keep" votes, one third unqualified "merge" votes, and one third "delete" votes, should it be deleted or not?