phoebe ayers wrote:
If the article in question can only be sourced to such websites (university bios, musical group bios, fan websites) or can only be sourced to current newspaper articles, and there are no other sources available, no matter how hard we look (no traditional encyclopedia entries, no who's who, no "music of the 1990s" book entries, no printed bios or interviews in magazines, etc) then that seems like a reasonable point to consider whether we need the bio.
No one's saying they *should* be, but you can't call an article unreferenced if it can be sourced to those things. The effort was made, after all.
-Jeff