On 3/7/07, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
Actually they don't seem to define what their counterpart to NPOV is. For example, is it ok to have an article which states all the horrible things that communists have done, and none of the horrible things Americans have done? In any normal, even "conservative" encyclopaedia, this would still be a glaring omission. If you don't define some kind of bounds or some central position, the whole thing just becomes propaganda or worse.
Seriously people, it's called Conservapedia! What do you expect, a balanced and neutral look at the world? I mean, any time you name something after a political movement, it's going to be biased. I'm not going to be that trusting of the sushi-eating-cappucino-drinking-homosexual-academic-liberal-hollywood-elite-pedia either, at least not on stuff like religious topics (even though that particular tomb would describe me as a person fairly well ;).
--Oskar