In a message dated 12/11/2008 9:09:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
The problem is that there's a very large chunk of literary studies that would reject the distinction between description and interpretation.>>
---------------------------- I'm waving my hands around :) IAR Phil. I'm sure people will let you know if you're overstepping. If you are *quoting* a source, then you are quoting it. That's not your interpretation, nor description, you're quoting.
Can you give an exact, concrete, specific, pure, simple, and direct example, without vague language :)
Not a hypothetical example. A real example, from the project.
Will Johnson
**************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolc...)