2009/8/21 Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org:
2009/8/20 Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipedia@gmail.com:
Is there a page to discuss the configuration(s) of ReaderFeedback?
The intent is to set up http://readerfeedback.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page with a bit more introductory text and then get the word out to start a conversation about the rating criteria we want to use for this, and indeed whether we want to use this at all. Because part of the point of this feature is to be able to compare perception of quality across languages, those criteria need to IMO be defined across at least all languages of a project.
I'm not sure that kind of comparison will be possible. It will be different people doing the assessments on each project and even with the best translations the criteria we use will have different nuances in different languages. For example, I expect languages with few literate speakers will do better than English since there are fewer alternatives to Wikipedia articles, so "good" just means better than nothing, rather than better than the various other reference materials written in English.