Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
I've always thought that WP is not in the business of "writing history". I'd need convincing that [[Iraq War]] has made the transition from "current affairs" to "history": it's obvious why some people might be consigning the War to history just now, but that is far from saying that the article measures up to the criteria.
Its an interesting way to look at an article. IIRC, I pushed people into naming it "Iraq War" to begin with - back when it was still called something less neutral - "invasion" or such. The current article is 193K? in size.. what's that in pages?
-S